|

Expert
Committee on the Transpersonal Vision in Management and Government.
First Draft 2 August 2000
The
following have been members of this group at times during the last
two years:
Evgueny
Faidych - Russia
Andrej
Gostev - Russia
John
Drew - United Kingdom
Joachim
Galuska - Germany
Christina
Leijonhufrud - Sweden
Gabor
Nagy - Hungary
Prabha
Calderon - Mexico and Belgium
Please
add your name if you wish to be on this list as a number of others
contributed but were not present all the time and may or may not
wish to be associated with this report. The intention is to provide
a backdrop for further work so please make your comments to support
this aim.
The
expert committee last year agreed that management is part of government
activity, of political activity and of profit and not-for -profit
organizations both large and small. The transpersonal vision in
management covers all of these. In this second meeting there was
considerable discussion about whether we could divide the transpersonal
in management from the transpersonal in everyday life. After all
most people are managing something nearly all the time and it perhaps
invidious to divide up decision taking in government or business
from taking decisions in everyday life.
There
was a view that the transpersonal was to do with identity and leadership
and that we should look at models of organisations and organisational
development. We soon came back to the fact that there is perhaps
very little difference from a transpersonal point of view between
decisions taken in the home or the domestic economy from those taken
at a nuclear power plant or at a strategic business meeting of a
multi-national company.
Transpersonal
teaching takes place in the " soft" rather than the "hard" management
disciplines. It is more allied to subjects such as personal development,
communication, creativity and group interaction than finance, marketing
and business strategy
If
we are to talk about the transpersonal to managers, the words we
use are vitally important. It will be necessary to show how and
why the transpersonal is important. We shall need to make statements
like: The transpersonal is a kind of common " language" or non-verbal
communication which is more intuitive than spoken, - perhaps a different
state of consciousness, which enables people from different races,
religions, economic and social organizations across the world to
understand that beyond the individual, there is a deep rooted experience
common to everyone and that through going back to one's
grounding, it may be possible to see how below everyday concerns
to do with economics or cultures or religions, there is a commonality
among people based on a shared concept of spirituality which transcends
national and societal and cultural boundaries. There is a link too
with some basic ethical issues, which may be common, to all.
We
discussed globalization, global awareness and the international
manager as a global nomad. We noted the contradictions and similarities
between globalization issues on the one hand and the very real demand
for micro-financial initiatives, such as community supported agricultural
groups and local currency systems on the other. We found that problems
of managing are the problems of managing irrespective of the level.
We
talked in depth about the new economic paradigm, of the new world
order as it is called politically and at length about "psychic manipulation"
by the media. Very different views of what was happening in the
former Yugoslavia were discussed. In the new geo-economic paradigm,
it will be vitally necessary for global management to understand
and work with local traditions and cultures, which are often deep,
rooted psychologically. This awareness does not exist much at the
moment. Similarly, from the local perspective, expatriate managers
or consultants living in local communities and working on local
micro-financial initiatives, need to understand these traditions
and cultures. This understanding too does not exist much at present
As
well as the profound problems of culture and tradition at every
level of society, there is the dramatic influence of technology,
which is changing the world fundamentally in the space of a few
decades. One of the most important issues is mind/computer interaction.
Recent research indicates that the computer is not just an information
device, but has a profound effect on consciousness and the unconscious
in ways not yet well understood.
What
could a transpersonal approach bring to these major issues? The
transpersonal approach articulated by Karl Gustav Jung shows that
different cultural and ethnic groups may have common deep rooted
" symbolic languages" or " information banks" which can probably
only be accessed by deeper awareness on the part of individuals
and organizations. The second committee distinguished between teaching,
preaching, investigating and researching in organisations and groups.
The shift in mass culture in the last 50 years was discussed at
this second meeting and the destruction of the family and other
reference groups for ethical and spiritual living, whether in established
religions, the family, the peer group, the university or school
- all had suffered setbacks. Was the role of the transpersonal approach
to radiate new thinking or to act as a magnet and attract others
to its philosophy? An active prophet or a role model which enthuses
others just by existing?
What
might this radiating or magnetism involve and what would be the
benefits? In the first of the two meetings we saw that the benefits
are inestimable because they could lead to individuals and organizations
worldwide understanding traditions and cultures and their profound
impact on global economics and local communities and the development
of satisfying lives for individuals who can benefit from the advantages
and be protected from the disadvantages of globalization. It involves
an act of faith and understanding of complex but well researched
and scientifically validated concepts such as:
-
Development of symbols (archetype language)
-
Altered states of consciousness
-
The emerging global citizen
-
The effect of virtual computer reality on the conscious and unconscious
mind
-
New tools including meditative techniques, quantum, synergetic and
fractal approaches
for developing the potentiality of the human mind
The
diversity of the group at the second meeting and differing views
on the way ahead made for
difficult conversations and meetings.
It
was agreed that further research and workshop meetings would be
required to study the new paradigm.
It
was also agreed in the second group as constituted that there were
some more interested in the transpersonal in society as a whole
rather than in management. This was perhaps because of the diversity
of backgrounds of the group who came to the study of the issue from
very different angles.
It
was agreed at the two meetings that there was a need for:
Identification of people in different countries interested in contributing
to the transpersonal in management
at two levels - that of people working in different cultures across
the world and that of
the man/machine relationship, particularly the effect of computers
on the human brain.
Research to determine how other parts of the world look at the New
Economic Order.
More experts in management if we were to pursue this Committee.
At the final session at Bad Kissingen, that the way ahead was to
look as the manager as creator and the transpersonal in leadership
in all economic, political and social fields.
We would need to teach by being, learn by doing and walk the talk.
We should look at the transpersonal in terms of radiation and attraction.
There was a need either to bring in more experts in management per
se or to blend the Committee for next year into a study of consciousness
(a word well understood these days) and society.
The
view at the final plenary session in Bad Kissingen was therefore
that the follow on Committee next year should be entitled " Consciousness
and Society. " Some of those present were happy with this, especially
Alfred Groff who agreed to chair this Committee. John Drew, Andrei
Gostev and Evgueny Faidych who were members during the last two
years said they would support the new initiative.
2
August 2000 First Draft
|